> On 27.02.2017, at 16:10, Theo de Raadt <dera...@openbsd.org> wrote:
>
>>>
>>> A patch to get away from SHA1 in dhcpd
>>>
>>
>> HMAC-SHA1 is not affected by the published collision, but I'm not
>> against switching the sync protocol to SHA2.  Performance also doesn't
>> matter that much here as the typical sync rate is fairly small.
>>
>> Once done, it should also be done for spamd-sync where the protocol came
from.
>
> Well, I don't see the point of making the change.  HMAC's are still safe.

True, I don't mind either way.

So let's keep "version 1" as it is.

Reyk

Reply via email to