Hello,

On Fri, Mar 17 2017 at 22:07, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2017-03-16, Sébastien Morand <seb.mor...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Thank you Mike for your answer. There is nothing more like you said.
> > Actually we succeed in phase 1 but not in phase 2.
> ..
> > It's look like good to me and conform to the provided specs. Phase 1 is ok
> > but no phase 2:
> > 155851.640374 Default ipsec_validate_id_information: dubious ID information
> > accepted
> > 155851.640478 Default isakmpd: phase 1 done: initiator id 196.207.241.154,
> > responder id 80.125.165.142, src: 192.168.254.2 dst: 80.125.165.142
> > 155918.682560 Default transport_send_messages: giving up on exchange
> > from-10.85.98.16/29-to-10.249.0.0/21, no response from peer
> > 80.125.165.142:4500
> ..
> > so it means to me they don't answer to my packet but I don't know why :
> > 16:01:41.673599 192.168.254.2.4500 > 80.125.165.142.4500:udpencap: isakmp
> > v1.0 exchange QUICK_MODE encrypted
> ..
> > Any idea what can be done or a way to get more information on what's going
> > on? They are using CISCO 6509 with IOS 12.2-33.SXH3a.
> 
> isakmpd sends the wrong encapsulation mode (always TUNNEL, not
> UDP_ENCAPSULATED_TUNNEL). But also last time I tried this (in 2011)
> Cisco hadn't caught up with the RFC and actually required the
> UDP_ENCAPSULATED_TUNNEL_DRAFT value from the draft nat-t spec.
> 
> This would cause a phase 2 failure, an ASA reports it like
> "[IKEv1]Phase 2 failure: Mismatched attribute types for class
>  Encapsulation Mode: Rcv'd: Tunnel Cfg'd: UDP Tunnel(NAT-T)"
> 
> Here's an old post about it with an isakmpd diff that was working
> against Cisco. What I don't know is whether it harms interop with
> anything else. 
>  
> http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=131244805816474

I ran with this patch on production for nearly 2 years. It didn't cause any
issue interoperating with few kind of devices. I successfully configured VPN
with ASA, Juniper, Fortinet, StormShield and Windows on the other side.
If there were some side effects, they were not visible.

Claer

Reply via email to