Hi Stuart,

thanks for your hints and pushing me in the right direction....

Thomas



2017-06-21 2:49 GMT+02:00 Stuart Henderson <[email protected]>:

> On 2017-06-20, miraculli . <[email protected]> wrote:
> > For every aiohttp instance I created one vether(4) and assigned
> 10.0.0.x/24
> > to it
>
> Don't put addresses from the same /24 onto a bunch of different
> interfaces. Use one /24 and the others should be /32 aliases, all on a
> single interface.
>
> > Right now the main problem is that relayd(8) dosen´t listen (on
> 0.0.0.0:80),
> > as httpd does for example. What I´m missing here?
>
> Your expectations don't match your current config. You would get that
> behaviour with a "relay" but you use "redirect" so relayd isn't supposed
> to bind to a port itself, instead it adds a PF rdr-to rule to the relayd
> anchor to forward traffic to the relevant backend.
>
> - from relayd.conf(5) :-
>
>      Redirections
>            Redirections are translated to pf(4) rdr-to rules for stateful
>            forwarding to a target host from a health-checked table on
> layer 3.
>
>      Relays
>            Relays allow application layer load balancing, TLS acceleration,
>            and general purpose TCP proxying on layer 7.
>
>
>


-- 
+49.179.1448024
Karl-Kunger-Straße 68
D - 12435 Berlin

Reply via email to