> On 05.07.2017, at 11:50, Kapetanakis Giannis <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On 05/07/17 12:45, Reyk Floeter wrote: >> >>> On 05.07.2017, at 11:41, Kapetanakis Giannis <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> On 04/07/17 19:09, Reyk Floeter wrote: >>>> Could you try again with the attached diff? It doesn't change >>>> behavior but it adds some chatty logging when a packet is rejected. >>>> Maybe it helps to find the issue. >>>> >>>> Reyk >>> >>> I've send the bug report as detailed as I could. >>> >> >> Thanks, now it is a good bug report and I think it helps to find the issue >> with carp+dhcrelay. >> >> You had a typo in the email subject ;-) >> >>> In a few words, applying your diff gave me these: >>> Jul 5 11:53:09 dhcrelay[68565]: decode_hw_header:229: invalid htype 0 >>> Jul 5 11:53:09 dhcrelay[68565]: receive_packet:457: decode_hw_header >>> failed, len 364 >>> Jul 5 11:53:10 dhcrelay[68565]: decode_hw_header:229: invalid htype 0 >>> Jul 5 11:53:10 dhcrelay[68565]: receive_packet:457: decode_hw_header >>> failed, len 364 >>> >> >> Reyk >> > > oops :)) > > sorry for that, do you want me to send it again with the correct subject so > it's archived ok? > > G >
No, no, it's fine. The content of the mail is more important. Reyk
