On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 09:04:33AM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote: > On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 04:20:31PM -0500, Kris Katterjohn wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 09:24:33AM -0700, Chris Cappuccio wrote: > > > This looks correct. Also, there's more: > > > > Thanks for looking and catching what I missed. It hit me a while after > > I sent my original email that relayd likely has the same bug. D'oh. > > > > Here is an updated patch for httpd, ldapd, relayd, smtpd, switchd and > > ypldap, which all seem to have the off-by-one bug for port number > > checking (where 65535 is unusable and called invalid, at least when > > specifying it as a number). Again, I cannot build and actually test > > this right now. > > > > Cheers, > > Kris Katterjohn > > > > ok gilles@ > > chris, are you taking care of committing this ?
I'm not sure of the appropriate amount of time to wait before bumping threads on this list, but since it's been a week... bump :-) Cheers, Kris Katterjohn
