> theo wrote: > > > > off_t is used where it should be used. size_t is used where it should > > be used. > > In that case I change the proposal to the introduction of an uoff_t, or > is there already something appropriate? If so, why doesn't dd(1) use it? > > > You are showing inexperience. > > Yes, you got that exactly.
Time to begin buffing the 'd' key.
