> On 2017-11-05, Jay Hart <jh...@kevla.org> wrote: >>> On 2017/11/02 20:26, Jay Hart wrote: >>>> > On 2017-10-30, Jay Hart <jh...@kevla.org> wrote: >>>> >> Good Evening Fellow OpenBSDers, >>>> >> >>>> >> Below is currently how I have my disk laid out partition wise. I have >>>> >> a feeling I need to >>>> swap >>>> >> /tmp and /usr in order to gain additional space for /usr. >>>> > >>>> >> /dev/wd0f 2.0G 1.7G 153M 92% /usr >>>> > >>>> > That seems way too much for /usr. sysclean (in packages) will probably >>>> > help >>>> > you identify some old files to remove. >>>> > >>>> > >>>> >>>> Stuart, >>>> >>>> A ton of files were identified, assume based on your reply I can just >>>> remove them with no >>>> issues? >>> >>> Things that sysclean finds under /usr are generally ok, if you've done >>> a few OS updates you will have a bunch of old gcc-related files, perl >>> binare modules from past versions, dead manual pages, etc. >>> >>> I would suggest loading into an editor, sorting, reviewing the list. >>> sysclean is aware of known ports files but there are some things like >>> optional config files that it can't know about, so watch out for those >>> (but usually not in /etc). If you're not confident you can tar them up >>> rather than removing outright. >>> >>> >> >> Stuart, >> >> Thanks for telling me about sysclean, I was not aware of this utility >> before. I've run sysclean >> and removed over 280 files/directories. and have improved free space quite a >> bit, but still seem >> to think I've an issue with /usr. >> >> Right now I have a clean 6.2 base system, but still have the source code >> tree installed for 6.1. >> Usually I just wipe /usr/src and /usr/obj, but I'm thinking I need to find a >> better way to >> manage >> /usr space. Can you instruct me a bit on what I should do with /usr (and >> all subdirectories) >> upon >> upgrading from one version to another. >> >> Here is my free space according to df after running sysclean and cleaning up >> those >> files/directories: >> >> Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on >> /dev/wd0a 1005M 63.4M 891M 7% / >> /dev/wd0k 22.7G 321M 21.3G 1% /home >> /dev/wd0d 3.9G 12.0K 3.7G 0% /tmp >> /dev/wd0f 2.0G 1.6G 274M 86% /usr >> /dev/wd0g 1005M 183M 771M 19% /usr/X11R6 >> /dev/wd0h 6.8G 27.1M 6.4G 0% /usr/local >> /dev/wd0j 3.9G 293M 3.5G 8% /usr/obj >> /dev/wd0i 3.9G 852M 2.9G 22% /usr/src >> /dev/wd0e 6.3G 28.1M 6.0G 0% /var > > 1.6GB used in /usr still seems a bit high. Do you have the ports tree > installed > there? Normally I'd recommend a separate partition for that. If not, you'll > need > to figure out what's using the space. > Stuart,
I do have the ports tree installed on /usr. To help break this down a bit, I ran 'du -hs' on each subdirectory of /usr, and here is size breakdown: /usr/X11R6 183M *separate partition /usr/bin 112M /usr/games 2.0k /usr/include 25.5M /usr/lib 169M /usr/libdata 39.9M /usr/libexec 38.4M /usr/local 27.1M *separate partition /usr/mdec 314k /usr/obj 293M *separate partition /usr/ports 382M /usr/sbin 17.3M /usr/share 231M /usr/src 852M *separate partition /usr/xenocara 657M /usr/xobj 3.1M Totaling everything that should be on the /usr partition, is just over 1.6GB. This seems to confirm df -h totals shown above. I have the 6.1 src, sys, ports, and xenocara gz files all untarred and installed. Again, thanks for your time. Jay
