Aren't you missing the vlan definition in hostname.vlan211 like:
# cat /etc/hostname.vlan211
inet 172.16.211.3 255.255.255.0 172.16.211.255*vlan 211* vlandev em0
or, like in 6.2:
inet 172.16.211.3 255.255.255.0 172.16.211.255 vnetid 211 parent em0
?
Erik
Op 6-11-2017 om 17:47 schreef Andre Ruppert:
> Hello @misc,
>
> perhaps I'm stupid, but I don't see my fault in a vlan network
> configuration:
>
> I got a OpenBSD 6.1 gateway box, connected to several switches.
>
> On em0 I habe to serve two networks:
> 172.16.210.0 (direct em0 - no vlan)
> 172.16.211.0 (VLAN 211 tagged on em0)
>
> ----------------------------
>
> On of my connections (em0) has a simple configuration on standard VLAN
> 1 (untagged):
>
> # ifconfig em0
> em0:
> flags=8b43<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,ALLMULTI,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST>
> mtu 1500
> lladdr a0:36:9f:36:49:e6
> description: sbc-ect-lan-ext
> index 1 priority 0 llprio 3
> media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT full-duplex,master)
> status: active
> inet 172.16.210.3 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 172.16.210.255
>
> # cat /etc/hostname.em0
> inet 172.16.210.3 255.255.255.0 172.16.210.255 description
> "sbc-ect-lan-ext"
>
> ------------------------------
>
> This interface also is "CARPed":
>
> # ifconfig carp0
> carp0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
> lladdr 00:00:5e:00:01:01
> index 8 priority 15 llprio 3
> carp: BACKUP carpdev em0 vhid 1 advbase 1 advskew 100
> groups: carp
> status: backup
> inet 172.16.210.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 172.16.210.255
>
> # cat /etc/hostname.carp0
> inet 172.16.210.1 255.255.255.0 172.16.210.255 vhid 1 carpdev em0 pass
> xxxxxxxx advskew 100
>
> (this gateway is the CARP slave (backup) of a pair of redundant gateways)
>
> -------------------------------
>
> Next: I want to have a VLAN on this interface em0:
> (the connected switch has a trunk configured this VLAN 210 (untagged)
> and VLAN 211 (tagged) - but I don't know if this information makes
> sense here)
>
> # ifconfig vlan211
> vlan211: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
> lladdr a0:36:9f:36:49:e6
> index 15 priority 0 llprio 3
> vlan: 211 parent interface: em0
> vnetid: 211
> parent: em0
> groups: vlan
> status: active
> inet 172.16.211.3 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 172.16.211.255
>
> # cat /etc/hostname.vlan211
> inet 172.16.211.3 255.255.255.0 172.16.211.255 vlandev em0
>
> ----------------------------------
>
> corresponding routing table (excerpt):
>
> # netstat -nr
> Routing tables
>
> Internet:
> Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Mtu
> Prio Iface
> default 172.16.0.15 UGS 1 191 - 8
>
> ...
> ...
>
> 172.16.210/24 172.16.210.3 UCn 1 1094 -
> 4 em0
> 172.16.210/24 172.16.210.1 Cn 0 0 -
> 19 carp0
> 172.16.210.1 00:00:5e:00:01:01 UHLl 0 153 -
> 1 carp0
> 172.16.210.3 a0:36:9f:36:49:e6 UHLl 0 275 -
> 1 em0
> 172.16.210.10 00:08:25:22:50:e0 UHLc 0 158 -
> 3 em0
> 172.16.210.255 172.16.210.3 UHPb 0 0 -
> 1 em0
> 172.16.210.255 172.16.210.1 HPb 0 0 -
> 1 carp0
> 172.16.211/24 172.16.211.3 UCn 0 1215 -
> 4 vlan211
> 172.16.211.3 a0:36:9f:36:49:e6 UHLl 0 0 -
> 1 vlan211
> 172.16.211.255 172.16.211.3 UHb 0 0 -
> 1 vlan211
>
> -----------------------------------------
>
> My problem:
>
> I am only able to ping myself (VLAN 211) - end I _don't_ think it's a
> switch problem - because I get an "no route to host" error
> # ping 172.16.211.3 # (my IP)
> PING 172.16.211.3 (172.16.211.3): 56 data bytes
> 64 bytes from 172.16.211.3: icmp_seq=0 ttl=255 time=0.153 ms
> 64 bytes from 172.16.211.3: icmp_seq=1 ttl=255 time=0.080 ms
> ...
> ...stupid but working as expected...
>
>
> # ping 172.16.211.2 # some other IP, same network
> PING 172.16.211.2 (172.16.211.2): 56 data bytes
> ping: sendmsg: No route to host
> ping: wrote 172.16.211.2 64 chars, ret=-1
> ping: sendmsg: No route to host
> ping: wrote 172.16.211.2 64 chars, ret=-1
> ping: sendmsg: No route to host
> ...
>
>
> The routing table then has added one new entry:
>
> 172.16.211/24 172.16.211.3 UCn 1 1743 -
> 4 vlan211
> 172.16.211.2 link#15 UHLc 0 1684 -
> 3 vlan211 !!!!!!!!!
> 172.16.211.3 a0:36:9f:36:49:e6 UHLl 0 18 -
> 1 vlan211
> 172.16.211.255 172.16.211.3 UHb 0 0 -
> 1 vlan211
>
>
> I'm clueless and don't know how to investigate further...
>
> In my pf.conf I tried to "temporarly annihilate" the rules on the em0
> interface ("set skip on em0"), but that didn't help....
>
> Any hints?
>
> head-scratching regards
>
> Andre Ruppert
>
