On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 04:57:14PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote: > >On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 05:58:59AM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote: > >> >A question to the experts here. > >> > > >> >My home router (a crappy one provided by my ISP) has ipv6 disabled, at > >> >least it's what its guied configuration tells me. :-) And I have ipv6 > >> >disabled in all my LAN machines. The laptop I use with OpenBSD has > >> >slaacd(8) up and running by default, even when I didn't configure any > >> >interface to use ipv6 at install time. > >> > > >> >Under the above conditions, do I still need slaacd running? > >> > >> Yes, absolutely. > >> > >> Otherwise one day you will configure up v6 on an interface and > >> come whining about how your custom configuration isn't do inet6 > >> boohoohoo. > > > >OK. You assume I'm an asshole. > > > >> > >> You need it. And don't go writing some balony blog saying you don't > >> need it. > > > >I don't need blogs. :-) > > > > > >Look, I'm very happy with OpenBSD (*honestly*) in the technical as well > >as in the human aspect. The *only one* negative point I found till now > >in this project is your attitude. The next time you want to insult me > >do it in private, in that way you won't harm the project (taking in care > >the other people working hard on it). > > Terribly sad you are such a sensitive soul.
Uh, your sarcasms hurt my delicate soul. :-) I don't usually come here to whine. I've always kept my systems as default as possible. I've never written any article about OpenBSD. Obviously it's not about me and *that's the bad news*. Whether or not you're right about users in general, there are more than one OS out there with long tradition and experience in developing with the assumption users are a bunch of irresponsible idiots. And they count with a stronger infrastructure than yours. It's not clever to compete with those monsters using their same strategy.
