> > Wait, you previously said your problem was with symlinks *permissions* but > now you're saying *ownership*! I can confirm that restore(8) didn't > preserve the permissions (thus the patch I sent), but as long as you ran it > with sufficient privilege it should have always restored symlink > *ownership*. Was that a slip of the tongue/fingers? > Sorry, I was just blathering about a different unrelated problem I had with website symlinks. My bad. Chris Bennett
- FAQ's duplicating file systems, both methods fail to repro... webmaster
- Re: FAQ's duplicating file systems, both methods fail... vincent delft
- Re: FAQ's duplicating file systems, both methods ... Philip Guenther
- Re: FAQ's duplicating file systems, both methods fail... webmaster
- Re: FAQ's duplicating file systems, both methods fail... webmaster
- Re: FAQ's duplicating file systems, both methods ... Philip Guenther
- Re: FAQ's duplicating file systems, both methods fail... webmaster
- Re: FAQ's duplicating file systems, both methods ... Philip Guenther

