> 
> Wait, you previously said your problem was with symlinks *permissions* but
> now you're saying *ownership*!  I can confirm that restore(8) didn't
> preserve the permissions (thus the patch I sent), but as long as you ran it
> with sufficient privilege it should have always restored symlink
> *ownership*.  Was that a slip of the tongue/fingers?
> 

Sorry, I was just blathering about a different unrelated problem I had
with
website symlinks. My bad.

Chris Bennett


Reply via email to