Listen to Üni: better change your pusher!
On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 4:45 AM, Epost <ep...@purebeneficience.net> wrote: > Not surprisingly, the naysayers of the thread are with the adamic lineage > of prophets: > > From https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SFxUqTlmMkU > > -- Üni - A Zén-realized concept of God.-- > > - I did "zén"-style "pure mind" meditation for 10 years. - > > Starting with typical religious dogma, and "god", and progressed soon into > complete transcendence, and ultimately close to "no concept", "absolute > reality", and "no mind", the wellknown things this is about. And realized a > concept of god there, Üni. > > Üni, master of all, as it is called, in a typical language. > > On the way there, abrahamic religion got absurd, and I was truly happy to > have defeated it. > Indeed it seems where the western concept of "god" is going, so the zén > egolessness influence is for a good reason. > > The reason I believe is that it is based on reason, and a pure mind, > rather than the hallucinatory agent type "visions" of prophets. > Indeed did not Adam use Amanita Muscaria, that has a symbiotic > relationship to the pine tree? And the result may be what one might call > today, a lower archaic state, more like a caveman. > From this caveman state, Adam realized his version of the divine. Where > the enemy supposedly is a madman, who does not believe. > Hallucinogens are often like this. Some enemyconcept, fundamental belief > and yet not quite conquering the enemy. Like a bad dream some might say. > Because ofcourse the enemy probably is Adam himself who hates himself for > abusing Amanita Muscaria, but in the schizophrenic state, it is someone > else. > So the whole religion based on a schizophrenic Adamic mind lasts for about > 1000 years, from 5000 BC. With wars against nonbelievers, and anyone not > fitting in. > > Until 4000 BC, where an intelligent mushroom user, actually makes up > another tree, that supposedly makes one the deity. This is the start of > modern self-development techniques where one is the deity oneself. And in a > way being the ultimate concept, escaping the Adamic schizophrenia. Unless > one actually used the mushroom that is. > > 2000 BC a very confounded man, believes that stars, suns and moons are his > deities. And suddently one day exclaims "Nay, I am not going to worship the > stars, the suns and the moons anymore. Now I am a prophet of Absolute > Reality". A very unlikely scenario. Yes, it is Abraham. Who cannot stop > talking about how his deity is óne, and so we have the word monotheism, > rather than just theism. Because that was supposedly so hard to understand. > > 0 AD, Jesus goes to a city, to tell them that "it is only óne", and then > "flies up into the sky", according to both Bible and Quran. > > 600 AD Muhammad talks about his deity Allah, keeping the Adamic > schizophrenia, now even more obtuse with both Abrahamic "one" talk and > covering "all things" in 500 pages. It results in a fundamental view, that > reflects the early wars of Adamic religion still, claiming he is the final > prophet. With the religious language similar to many hallucinatory agent > popvideos. Meaning ofcourse that there is no "revelation", but rather > writings based on hallucinatory visions. And indeed the typical > hallucinatory agent prophet lineage ends there. > > But: > Approximately a little before or after 0 AD, "Buddha" writes the > Dhammapada, that seems to be based on the belief that hallucinogens made > them the deity, but now iterated to a focus on the mind. With earlier > shrines being tree-shrines, so a form of canonization of this line of > knowledge. The writer is cleary inspired by Abraham. But since it focuses > on the mind, interpretators take it in the direction of zén, that in turn > goes away from The Dhammapada, and instead focuses on a pure mind, and > absolute reality. This indeed becomes the most rational version of > spirituality. > > And in the 1500s The Bible starts being massprinted, which leads to a > mass-criticism of the text, leading to the "age of enligthenment" in the > 1800s, and who we are now, and our modern society. > And indeed instead of the original godconcepts of prophets, we have "god", > which is a rationalized verison of it. > Which in deep zén-meditation becomes "Üni", and rationalized to the > fullest extent. And free of hallucinatory agent connections. > > Unfortunately hallucinatory agent type language still continues to be > used, even among many who claim rationality, in a scientific dicipline. > Dual State Potential, is not a rational thought, and some quantum > physicists are the Abraham of our time, and should be warned against. They > can go indeed on and on, while a discusser indicated that "he might go mad" > if he continued with this, and that "many had". And talked about E=mc2, and > how infinity and the universe was a wave function. Can you do math on > infinity? I thought that was "not a number". Einstein was ofcourse a > believer in Judaism, and "the god of Abraham". > > Peace. > > > Den 1/3/2018 01:11, skrev Eric Furman: > >> Please go spread crazy somewhere else. >> We're all filled up here. >> >> On Tue, Jan 2, 2018, at 9:39 AM, Epost wrote: >> >>> I have rationalized this even futher. Some of the reason for me >>> rejecting GNU was indeed the hallucinogenic element. I hate indeed >>> "psilocybin prophets"and that they supposedly can tell me something >>> about reality. >>> >>> So I have dropped the entire adamic lineage of psilocybin prophets, and >>> replaced the deity concept with Üni, which is a rational zén realized >>> concept. Indeed "God" already is far a rationalization of the prophets >>> sayings. >>> >>> I hope you´ll come around to understanding my view. >>> >>> Peace. >>> >>> Racoh Box - An alpha specification for a fair economy on available >>> source. - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8HzSVdBHZU >>> >>> >
