Sun, 28 Jan 2018 15:11:41 +0100 Hiltjo Posthuma <hil...@codemadness.org> > On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 12:56:26PM +0000, Andy Lemin wrote: > > Really, did he actually post any real vulnerabilities to OpenBSD! > > > > This article has to be govt propaganda.. > > > > https://www.csoonline.com/article/3250653/open-source-tools/is-the-bsd-os-dying-some-security-researchers-think-so.amp.html > > > > I was laughing with tears when I read this.. > > > > Hey, > > Maybe I shouldn't reply, but I feel this is insulting to the amazing work of > Van Sprundel. I've also seen better nuanced articles about the same > presentation talk. > > Sources: > - https://www.openbsd.org/errata60.html (the batch of patches on August 3 > 2017). > - http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article&sid=20170804053102 > - Slides: > https://media.defcon.org/DEF%20CON%2025/DEF%20CON%2025%20presentations/DEFCON-25-Ilja-van-Sprundel-BSD-Kern-Vulns.pdf > - https://www.openbsd.org/errata56.html (earlier work). > > Please do more research before you post. >
Hi Hiltjo, His 2017-12-29 talk was obviously an old presentation, help him fix it. https://media.ccc.de/search/?q=sprundel https://media.ccc.de/v/34c3-8968-are_all_bsds_created_equally https://fahrplan.events.ccc.de/congress/2017/Fahrplan/events/8968.html We all know the BSDs are not sitting on bugs, stale data is misleading. Kind regards, Anton Lazarov
