Will definitely do that, but still looking for any explanation from devs :).
-- Adonis > On Jul 18, 2018, at 5:28 AM, LÉVAI Dániel <[email protected]> wrote: > > Adonis Peralta @ 2018-07-18T10:49:57 +0200: >>> Maybe this is the culprit? >>> >>> /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/if_em.c: >>> 1893 if (sc->hw.mac_type >= em_82543 && sc->hw.mac_type != >>> em_82575 && >>> 1894 sc->hw.mac_type != em_82580 && sc->hw.mac_type != >>> em_i210 && >>> 1895 sc->hw.mac_type != em_i350) >>> 1896 ifp->if_capabilities |= IFCAP_CSUM_TCPv4 | >>> IFCAP_CSUM_UDPv4; >>> >>> It seems as if I350 (among a few other) has an exception for these >>> features. Maybe it was not tested well enough, or actually it was, and >>> was failing in this department. >>> Maybe a developer can add some insight, if this catches their eyes :) >>> >> Exactly! This is a really really nice card and I don’t get why OpenBSD >> doesn’t support the offloading features just as you’ve shown for bge and >> re0. Definitely awaiting a response from the devs on this. > > If I'm not mistaken this was introduced with this commit: > http://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sys/dev/pci/if_em.c.diff?r1=1.269&r2=1.270 > > Without trying to sound like the chicken [1], if you're adventurous enough, > you can always enable it for I350 and > 1) recompile > 2) try > 3) report back / send in diff :) > > > Daniel > > [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Chicken_and_the_Pig > > -- > LÉVAI Dániel > PGP key ID = 0x83B63A8F > Key fingerprint = DBEC C66B A47A DFA2 792D 650C C69B BE4C 83B6 3A8F >
