On 2/7/06, Joe S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > RedShift wrote: > > Hi everyone > > > > I've noticed OpenBSD still uses Apache httpd 1.3. While it is good that > > on the OpenBSD side of things, it is maintained and there's an > > additional focus on security for httpd. However, sooner or later, > > httpd 1.3 *will be deprecated* in favor of newer versions (2.0, 2.2), > > and now certainly with 2.2 released. > > > > Are there any plans about when 2.2 (or 2.0) will be included in the base > > fileset? Or remove apache out of the fileset and let the users install > > it themselfs with a port? > > > > Glenn > > > > > I couldn't find anything in the misc archives, but perhaps I didn't > really look that hard. But the biggest issue is the Apache 2.0 license. > I'm not sure what the problem is with the license, but I believe it may > be that Apache 2 license is more restrictive. In what way? I don't know. > > http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq1.html#HowAbout
That was referenced from the list reply where someone claimed there was no problem. A quick web search will probably give the reason too.