On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 08:37:01AM -0700, Andy Bradford wrote: > Thus said Jonathan Gray on Mon, 19 Nov 2018 20:42:46 +1100: > > > > Thanks for the suggestion. Here's the additional output provided by your > > > patch: > > > > > > radeon_atrm_get_bios false > > > radeon_acpi_vfct_bios false > > > igp_read_bios_from_vram false > > > radeon_read_bios false > > > radeon_read_disabled_bios true > > > drm:pid0:r600_init *ERROR* Expecting atombios for R600 GPU > > > drm:pid0:radeondrm_attachhook *ERROR* Fatal error during GPU init > > > [TTM] Memory type 2 has not been initialized > > > drm0 detached > > > radeondrm0 detached > > > > Thanks, could you also show the i386 output with the patch? > > The output on i386 looks pretty much the same except for the failure: > > initializing kernel modesetting (RV610 0x1002:0x94C1 0x1028:0x0D02). > radeon_atrm_get_bios false > radeon_acpi_vfct_bios false > igp_read_bios_from_vram false > radeon_read_bios false > radeon_read_disabled_bios true > radeondrm0: 1680x1050, 32bpp > wsdisplay0 at radeondrm0 mux 1: console (std, vt100 emulation), using wskbd0
r600_read_disabled_bios is just doing register reads/writes it isn't clear to me why that would be different between amd64 and i386.
