> totally agree, Anatoli could you please compare ?
Will try to make tests these days + will attach dmesg. Anyway, without a
FS (sequentially writing to a raw device) we'd be testing just the
sequential speed to a raw device, not even to a partition. I think this
would be a practical maximum possible performance for that device, not a
real-use scenario. But combined with other tests this could be an
interesting stat to find the bottleneck.
*From:* Chris Cappuccio <ch...@nmedia.net>
*Sent:* Tuesday, April 09, 2019 10:36
*To:* Gwes <g...@oat.com>
*Cc:* Chris Cappuccio <ch...@nmedia.net>, Anatoli <m...@anatoli.ws>, Misc
<misc@openbsd.org>
*Subject:* Re: compared filesystem performance, was Re: 10GBit network
performance on OpenBSD 6.4
gwes [g...@oat.com] wrote:
That doesn't answer the question: if you say
dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda (linux) /dev/rsd0c (bsd) bs=64k count=1000000
what transfer rate is reported
totally agree, Anatoli could you please compare ?
That number represents the maximum possible long-term filesystem
performance on that drive.
you mean non-filesystem?
