On Sun, 28 Jul 2019, Nathan Hartman wrote:
*IF* the OpenBSD devs ever wants to change SCMs--I said **IF**--then I root for Subversion. Subversion offers the following advantages:
If wants to change just for changing, then there are reasons to select something else? I realy do not understand this logic that drives this discussion. What I like of CVS: rcs textfiles, transparency, no strange db. That is a reason for which I would decide for CVS and nothing else for a bigger project. I use fossil for my small programs, better said, misuse, because I do not use it as a real SCM, but just for backuping history. And I like it very much. Rodrigo
