Just wanted to say a thank you for everyone’s comments.  I’ve combined all my 
replies into one mostly to sum everything up.

> On Oct 2, 2019, at 02:16, Stefan Sperling <s...@stsp.name> wrote:
> Try adding swap space.
> I have added 2GB of swap space on my alix and it has been running fine ever 
> since.

My “disk” is 2GB. I don’t even have any X sets loaded as they won’t fit.

> On Oct 2, 2019, at 09:03, Olivier Cherrier <o...@symacx.com> wrote:
> On mine (only 32 MB of swap), I had to disable kernel relinking.
> Otherwise, the system more or less collapses at boot time.


Yeah, I believe I only have 32MB of swap (I chose the default disk layout oh so 
long ago).


> On Oct 2, 2019, at 08:34, Joe Barnett <joe.barn...@mr72.com> wrote:
> I cannot comment on the upgrade process, but I have had zero fatal issues 
> running 6.5 on my alix2d13 boards.  That said, memory has been getting 
> tighter with more recent OpenBSD versions, and swap (as someone else 
> suggested) should help.  I love these reliable boards, but they are starting 
> to show their age (at least relative to how I use them with OpenBSD).

Yeah, so I’m wondering if I want to get a larger CompactFlash card and 
reinstall, try and be clever and go off the reservation, or just pack in the 9 
of these things I have and get an APU.

> On Oct 2, 2019, at 09:15, Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org> wrote:
> After boot, the kernel is relinked in a random order in the background
> ("/usr/libexec/reorder_kernel &" in /etc/rc). 

Yes, I’m familiar with why it’s done.  I was mostly wondering if I broke 
something because I’ve not had this problem since I got these things (I don’t 
even know how long ago), and 6.5 just killed it.

> Unfortunately the Alix doesn't have much RAM and if you have pretty
> much anything other than a minimal set of daemons running it won't
> cope well.

I’m running nsd and unbound.  I can turn off smtpd. . . What I would be nice to 
do is delay starting daemons until relinking is done.  Regardless, I think I 
have my answer about why it’s falling over.

> You can disable the reordering by removing /var/db/kernel.SHA256
> but be aware that syspatch relies on the reorder_kernel mechanism in
> order to apply kernel patches. 

Good to know.  I’m going to do everything I can to avoid turning off relinking, 
because I want to go on the big boy rides! :-)

Sean

Reply via email to