Hi community, I reply to myself : wonderfull. I've setup a full KDE environment in half-a-day. I remember some Gentoo days where I had to wait sometimes for days for the same thing (that crashes because I was so aggressive with gcc optimisation :)
I really enjoy to discover that OpenBSD is also excellent for desktop in a full open-source environment. I'm now totally addicted ! :) Also, I think OpenBSD is seen as a hardcore-security-os-that-wont-run-anything-because-its-a-security-hole, which is FALSE : YOU CAN *EASILY* USE OPENBSD FOR SOMETHING ELSE THAN A ROUTER AND THAT MUST BE KNOWN :) The pure-monolitic kernel is really wonderfull : no dumb module to load that you forget to compile, auto-probing, no user-land craps (pcmcia-cs)... For me, OpenBSD is one of the best open-source spirit incarnation : if something does really not work on OpenBSD, it's not the good way. Thanks to the developpers to make it possible. Best regards, Bruno. Note : Recently, NetBSD-current support wpa_supplicant. I try to use it with OpenBSD... See http://mail-index.netbsd.org/current-users/2005/10/01/0014.html 2006/2/14, Bruno Carnazzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi all, > > I'd like to know if someone tried to build a desktop environment on > OpenBSD/i386. I think to rich desktop like Gnome or KDE. Is it hard ? > What's your feedback ? > > Best regards, > > Bruno.
