Wed, 15 Apr 2020 23:26:44 +0200 Paolo Aglialoro <paol...@gmail.com>
> Thank you for the explanation, Otto.
> 
> Is this a hint that soon i386 architecture will be deprecated?

Hello Paolo,

Considering that it's worth reading the reply without misinterpreting anything,
it is here quoting this again:  "What other OS maintainers do is their choice".
Let's not invent reasons to claim if it does not work for you then nobody else.

Kind regards,
Anton Lazarov
MScEng EECSIT

> Considering that supported hw (at least graphics) is going more and more to
> overlap with amd64, at the very end i386 would remain only for some
> routerboards.
> 
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 8:14 PM Otto Moerbeek <o...@drijf.net> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 04:55:04PM +0200, Paolo Aglialoro wrote:
> >  
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I read from the 6.5 to 6.6 upgrade guide that the following files:
> > >
> > >
> > > */usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/s3_drv.la <http://s3_drv.la>
> > > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/s3_drv.so
> > > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/s3virge_drv.la <http://s3virge_drv.la>
> > > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/s3virge_drv.so/usr/X11R6/man/man4/s3.4
> > > /usr/X11R6/man/man4/s3virge.4*
> > >
> > > are being deleted as "retired". Does this mean that my IBM T23 will stop
> > > its X-life at 6.5 or is its S3 Virge video card supported in some other
> > > decent way (VESA or whatever)? I would be glad to know it *before* trying
> > > this upgrade.
> > >
> > > If the sad answer would be "no more support", could I ask why this,
> > > together with several i686 still working boxes, would be dropped while
> > > other OSs aren't doing so?
> > >
> > > Thanks  
> >
> >
> >
> > http://cvsweb.openbsd.org/xenocara/driver/Makefile?rev=1.74&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup
> >
> > explains it:
> >
> > "Unlink a number of old video drivers from the build.
> >
> > The corresponding hardware is out of date, barely useable
> > with modern systems and their code is not maintained.
> > ok sthen@"
> >
> > We have a very limited numnbers of volunteers. In general, code is a
> > liability, not an asset. What other OS maintainers do is their choice.
> >
> >         -Otto
> >  

Reply via email to