On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 04:26:37PM +0200, Peter J. Philipp wrote: > Hi, > > I was wondering if binutils-2.17 will be that version for the next foreseeable > future? Reason being is that there is backports to RISCV's binutils but they > don't go that low to 2.17. Since I'm lazy, I don't really want to port > binutils to 2.17 for any architecture if it's not already done so. > Unfortunately I only invested a handful of days looking into the problem and > just as many procrastinating around this. > > I lost contact to the riscv group, but if I rejoin them I'd like to give them > something and not just look happy. :-) > > Peace. > -peter
Any idea why you feel this is needed? After all, the tree in that repo already builds cleanly without needing to do this. Ps that workspace is still open, just a bit idle the last few months. -ml
