On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 07:01:26PM -0600, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Hannah Schroeter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > X isn't in packages, but in simple tarballs.
> >
> > cd / ; for i in some/path/x*.tgz; do tar xvvzpf $i; done
> >
> > Configure if needed, run X.
> >
>
> Nick Holland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> > No.
> > X is not a "package". It is a file set, not part of the ports tree.
>
> Not to be argumentative but ratpoison is still dependant on it [them].
> Seems that should be made apparent in the ports search output somehow eh?
Well, you *are* under /usr/ports/x11...
It could be argued that some output might be desirable here; but on the
other hand, this would lead to lots of people asking on misc@ where this
'x' package can be found...
Joachim
