Howdy misc, A few months ago I posted some issues I was having with switch(4) on my APU2: https://marc.info/?t=160399082000001&r=1&w=2
I've come to the conclusion that maybe switch(4) isn't as mature as I thought, or perhaps, I'm just using it wrong. At the time I was convinced that bridge(4) was legacy and that switch(4) was a replacement for it. I'm pretty sure I got this impression from reyk@'s presentation: https://www.openbsd.org/papers/bsdcan2016-switchd.pdf To be fair there are a lot of warnings in there that switch(4) isn't production ready but I think slides 9- gave me the impression that I should consider switch(4) as an eventual replacement for bridge(4). My questions to the devs and community are: 1) Has anyone successfully replaced bridge(4) with switch(4)? 2) Is bridge(4) still as bad as described in slide 9? (esp MP issues) 3) Should switch(4) still be seen as a replacement for bridge(4)? Any insight is appreciated. Thanks, John
