On 02/03/06, Graham Toal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Personally I do believe in Backup MX, as long as it does proper > relay checking. It's nice if it also does spam checking, but > not critical because your primary MX will still do that. However
Do you know just how disturbing it is to receive bounces for emails one does not send? FYI, spamcop happily accepts mail bounces as spam. And be sure, I do report these bounces for my domains with 'v=spf1 a mx -all'. Cheers, Constantine.
