My ssh keys make more sense than this gibberish. Balder Oddson <ola...@gmail.com> writes:
> Whereof everyone is interested, > > > > A few things about his architecture is extraordinary special. > > #1 ideal properties, can never be done better for some things. > #1.1 analogue, you need ground and good drain, to do work during weak force > pull. > #1.2 physical, independent IC's, relying on physics for syncronization. > #1.2.1 allowing digital global sync between die slots, async, but local > sync with global clock. > #1.3 as a turing machine, everything is virtually represented with > arrays of addresesses in cintinous memory. > #1.3.1 You get scalar operations on your vectors with SIMD insutrctions. > #1.3.2 Remotely scatter data in remote memory, that is gathered into > another continous area of memory with addresses to data. > > > On the one hand, where this gives 8x the performance at a high price, it > likely caused as much awe, inspiration and anxiety in the finance sector > where Cray got the funding to research, build and sell these beasts. > > The Cult of the Holy Cow, and The Cult of the Dead Cow are oxymorons if > the contexts abd historic circumstances are to be considered. > > Using hex numbers, would ideally imply an understanding of the Cray > architecture, and why it perhaps now can be be software defined. > > > -- > Balder Oddson
