Sonic <sonicsm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 18, 2021 at 3:55 PM Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org> wrote:
> >
> > The bits that can't be handled are the more per-interface things ("fetch
> > an address but ignore dns or the default route on interface X however do
> > fetch them from interface Y", or "my ISP won't give me a lease without
> > providing a client-id"). Sometimes people are just doing that because
> > they can and they could do things differently; other times it's because
> > they need to and in the current state dhcpleased isn't suitable for
> > them.
>
> I notice that dhcpleased and resolvd are started by default, is there
> any reason to run them on a system with only static interfaces?
Lots of excellent reasons.
