I found valuable suggestions in your messages. I am sure at
least one of them will work (you mentioned things I never thought of).
On the other hand, you don't need to get upset. I was not complaining. I
will write this sysctl (if only I knew how...). If you point me to some
documentation on this topic I will write it. My idea was that maybe it
would be better if a person with experience would write this. There's
no problem, I will write it (again: point me some documentation). I will
repeat: I was not complaining; I know that a lot of "smart" people are
complaining here, but I'm not one of them.
Just a suggestion: maybe The OpenBSD project would make some money if
they provide binary patches (just like SuSE) - for source patches
you don't have to pay, while a sort of affiliation is needed for binary
patches (some money required). I think there are a lot of people that
will pay for a real FAST update...
Respectfully yours,
Gabriel George POPA
Hans van Leeuwen wrote:
Gabriel George POPA wrote:
Thank you Joachim. Now, regarding spamd(8), I knew that I need help
from pf. Regarding SpamAssassin: I did pkg_add, I followed
the instructions on modifying /etc/procmailrc I started spamd (spamc
should have been called for every message). Nothing happened.
No mail message was scanned.
You have to tell sendmail to pass the message to procmail.
See the part about sendmail.cf in procmail's manpage.
Regarding that sysctl: shouldn't we add it?
Thats not how it works here.
Either you write a patch or stop complaining about the lack of features.
Regarding the upgrade: I will build the distribution using this
machine (3GHz P4, 1GB RAM) - my server is not under heavy load in this
period of the week. I just hoped binpatch could be a better solution.
OpenBSD doesn't supply binary patches, and this isn't going to change.
See the archives for more information.
Good luck,
Hans
