On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 09:55:13PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > > Do not assume "desireable" and "possible" are always the same.
> > 
> > My point was whether the wording "installable on 512MB of storage" is
> > appropriate to put in the OpenBSD 7.3 FAQ, and whether "desirable" and
> > "possible" are the same is outside the discussion.
> 
> No, it is optimistic oversell by the faq authors
> 
> It should be realistic & accurate, or it should say nothing at all.

If I rembember correctly, the 512MB number was somewhere in the "possible
but not comfortable" range way back when the text was originally written.
But that was before several space consuming things such as the relinking
at boot steps happened.

A more realistic estimate looking a the various systems I have within reach
suggests "you can squeeze in a full install inside 1GB, but if you plan on
installing any packages or storing data locally, there is no point in setting
yourself up for the pain of running out of storage".

You could probably find the absolute minimim (an actually quite useless number) 
by
checking the uncompressed sizes of the *.tgz install sets, but the last time I
remember doing a "df -h" on a fresh install before installing any packages or
introducing any data, the total ran to somewhere in excess of 650MB.

The system with the least storage allocated that I interact with regularly
is a thing that runs spamd and some content filtering, with a total of 6GB
storage, and at most times uses about two thirds of that.

If the bare minimum size for an OpenBSD install is vital information to you
for some reason, the way to find out is to do a fresh install using only the
Enter key, then recording he total used after first reboot. The exact number
is likely a little different across the 14 supported architectures.

-- 
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
https://bsdly.blogspot.com/ https://www.bsdly.net/ https://www.nuug.no/
"Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious network traffic"
delilah spamd[29949]: 85.152.224.147: disconnected after 42673 seconds.

Reply via email to