I agree with the general thoughts around these last observations.
The gui you are proposing is a little too black starting from the sidebar logo and the font a little small. Probably is that we like blood here but not the black color..... (if not in night mode) Also most of us are probably affectionated to the stylished standard html gui and what I mean with this are all the classic a and a:visited colors, the classic browser font, _self on links etc Sometimes appears more friendly and "honest" to the user leaving or adopting these stylish standards. The server pictures are also just a little geeky meaningful stuff. Possible sidebar logo solution: adopt the foreground color of the main versioned logo (if you like that sidebar logo: it is however a repetition..); fonts: under a certain screen size you can adopt a vw sized font, and over a certain screen size a general px sized font, it is a trick commonly used by me in my web apps. -- Daniele Bonini Aug 11, 2023 02:10:52 Matthew Ernisse <[email protected]>: > The dark mode link colors are way too dark, especially in the case of > previously visited links. They are nearly unreadable. I have not looked at > light mode -- I don't use it. > > I don't know if it is font sizes or paddings but the index.html sidebar > links feel cramped. One would imagine having a hard time tapping on them on > mobile if one were inclined to such a thing. In fact I that comparing the > versions side by side, all the font sizes are too small. > > I don't think removing the text-decoration: underline from links has served a > purpose. If anything it makes it less usable. There are these random cases > where you have blue mono-spaced fonts for some reason and it's not immediatly > obvious to me if the color is supposed to indicate a clickable link or if the > color + font change is supposed to indicate something else.
