On 3/26/06, A Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been comparing FreeBSD with OpenBSD as of late for the role of web
> server.  I generally prefer OpenBSD because I find it easier to use (I
> like finding the configs for my installed applications in /etc not
> /usr/local/etc among other things) however, jail()-from what I've
> read-seems to be superior to chroot(), which leads me to my question:
> why isn't jail() implemented in OpenBSD? It does look like a massive
> undertaking would be needed to implement it, but code auditing is also a
> big undertaking as well(unless I am mistaken).
> I've checked the man pages and the archives and I didn't find the
> answers there (it's possible that I overlooked them too).

Jail really is nice, but you can accomplish the same thing when using
chroot + systrace if you just want a single running service per
virtual jail. You can make it even tighter then a jail. But ok, it is
a lot of work, jails make it easy to implement virtual servers. It is
a nice feature, but I don't miss it on OpenBSD.

Wijnand
--
OpenBSD needs your help improving the softwareworld, please donate:
http://openbsd.org/donations.html

Yes big code using companies, that includes you!

Reply via email to