Hi Igor, On Wed, May 07, 2025 at 07:33:14PM +0200, Igor Zornik wrote: > I was reading your article "Sane Email" when the following PF rule in it > caught my attention: > > pass in on egress inet6 proto tcp from any to any port smtp \ > divert-to ::1 port spamd set queue spamd set prio 0 > > This sends IPv6 traffic to spamd, but as far as I know spamd doesn't do > IPv6. Is the rule incorrect or am I just missing something here?
Argh, you're right of course. It is likely I was testing a patched spamd that *did* to some extent support IPv6 back when that was written, but IPv6 support did not make it into the main tree, unfortunately. Thanks for pointing this out! I'll fix right away. All the best, Peter -- Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team https://bsdly.blogspot.com/ https://www.bsdly.net/ https://www.nuug.no/ "Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious network traffic" delilah spamd[29949]: 85.152.224.147: disconnected after 42673 seconds.
