> On Fri, Jun 27, 2025, at 1:51 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote: > >> drive, but you would get at least some advantage from having ZFS serve up > >> the > >> storage. I didn't do any testing though, so I still don't know how well it > >> would work. Maybe someone else has tried it. > > > > That's not going to get you history, it would still be an FFS filesystem > > I think it would let you mount earlier versions of the filesystem > read-only. You'd have to separately mount each date-time you wanted > to examine; annoying unless you scripted it. I'm not going to go
You could get that with rsnapshot using hardlinks, dirs named after the dates the last sync was made. Not a totally bad setup for crash recovery kinds of backups, but not the same as versioning either. -- May the most significant bit of your life be positive.
