Am 25.07.2025 um 11:45 schrieb Tomasz Rola: > On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 01:10:23PM +0200, Anders Andersson wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 7:13 AM Tomasz Rola <rto...@ceti.pl> wrote: >>> > [...] >>> >>> In contrast to that, cvs is easy enough to be quickly understood and >>> used by oneself. >> >> This is a silly argument though, and even incorrect. Git is not github >> or gitlab. One could easily have made a similar "cvshub" website. > > Right, it is not, but at the same time I cannot recall reading a > comment from git user who uses git locally all the time, without > interacting with git*.com ... AFAICT git is used mostly to sync source > with remote repo, but of course I may be wrong because I do not use > it.
I am using git locally only syncing with SVN and CVS repositories. Sometimes working locally for weeks, than squashing, rebasing and such to make my CTRL-S commits appear sane in the remote SVN oder CVS repository. For me this works perfectly. Those final commits could also be sent as a patch to some mailing list, though. I am even reording commits locally that way to make sure they apply correctly. In the end, it does not matter if the project is using CVS, SVN, git or whatever, as long as there is an adapter to git like git-svn and such. -- Christian
