If the dev is what you are wondering in the moment you launch sysclean then I could say there are other tools you can escalate your worries, one is "ports" or a sophisticated ver of it; the other one could be a "config" that allow the dev to backup his libs and includes. I personally do same with other stuff eg. like working with the letsencrypt certs. Simpler comparison but renders the idea.
-Dan ------ bsd.gaoxio.com - Repo: https://code.5mode.com Please reply to the mailing-list, leveraging technical stuff. 11 ago 2025 08:02:47 dan <d...@nnnne-o-o-o.com>: > > It is still about philosophy and I'm just here like an enduser, pardon moi.. > > Indeed, I question the existance of a tool like sysclean. It should be the > duty of the devs to give a clean system back to the enduser. > > Instead you produced a medium that says to the enduser: "uh, look we have no > time to delete lib neither includes" but "uh, we have spare time to prop you > to erase your conf and mounts". > > Don't worry I'm on strike against the sentence "we are all devs" as well. > That's for sure the point. > > -Dan > > ------ > bsd.gaoxio.com - Repo: https://code.5mode.com > > Please reply to the mailing-list, leveraging technical stuff. > > 10 ago 2025 20:47:28 Janne Johansson <icepic...@gmail.com>: > >> Den sön 10 aug. 2025 kl 13:52 skrev Dan <d...@nnnne-o-o-o.com>: >>> >>> I am not planning to take responsibility of erasing files >>> in place of sysclean, it seems obvious.. >> >> Well, it's your system, so the responsibility lies with you >> regardless, but also 'sysclean' only produces a list, nothing else. >> You are always going to be the one doing any deletes based on its >> output. Even the manpage says as much: "It does not remove anything on >> the system." >> >> -- >> May the most significant bit of your life be positive.
