On Sun, Sep 14, 2025 at 02:18:35PM -0400, Charles wrote: > I noticed that it appears OpenBSD wanted some of FreeBSD's words > and the way they did that is through NetBSD. However NetBSD added > a derogatory term for a female body part. I could be wrong due to > the change description's wording. > > I'm assuming this is a mistake since it doesn't seem that FreeBSD > ever contained it, but it doesn't make sense since they could've > just added the ones from FreeBSD directly. > > In case the word should be kept for whatever reason then there's > no need to apply this. > > Below is a diff(1) output that can be applied to share/dict/web2 in src > to remove it. > > 161992d161991 > < quim >
Impressive. So you studied the source of an operating system that emphasizes 1) secure code 2) developer convenience but your threat model is such that a four letter word has a higher priority. Perhaps you would be more comfortable contributing to Jesux (https://pudge.net/jesux/) instead? -- Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team https://nxdomain.no/~peter/blogposts https://nostarch.com/book-of-pf-4th-edition "Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious network traffic" delilah spamd[29949]: 85.152.224.147: disconnected after 42673 seconds.
