And did you see any code?
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 08:16:06PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > you obviously missed the part about the preposterously slow compression
> times.
>
> Well..
> You missed my point. I know you don`t crosscompile but you can compress
> all Archives on a stronger Computer. So a VAX isn`t the best hardware to
> start with LZMA compressing. Yes..
>
> Something else: You compress install Sets for CDs mostly just once but
> they get decompressed many times. :)
> And if somebody wanna change these install Sets he could use another Box
> for the compression. But I don4t think there`s anybody out there who just
> owns a 486 and a VAX.
>
> You would save a lot Bandwith and also storage space on the CDs.
> E.g. the src gets compressed very well and the decompression isn`t that
> much slower.
>
>
> That`s why I asked.. and because I read about it on undeadly.org (-:
>
> Sebastian
