On Mon, 1 May 2006 11:29:26 +0200, Henrik Borgh wrote: >I suscpect that the situation is pretty much the same on every laptop, >equpped with a Insyde MobilePRO BIOS, which according to the >manufacturer could be "Acer, Arima, ASE, Canon, Casio, Clevo, Compal, >Compaq, Hewlett-Packard, Hitachi, Kapok, MiTAC, Sharp, >Siemens-Nixdorf, Sotec, Symbol Technologies, and Twinhead" >(http://www.insydesw.com.tw/en/Ps.asp?id=119). >
There's a list that will be on a no-go filter for future purchases by my corporate clients. Given the paucity of information available to purchasers (other than "it runs with XP, what's your problem?) we will assume, in the absence of other evidence, that their BIOS is not acceptable. Monoculture will again cause grief to "farmers" who practice it: Fuckwits. >From the land "down under": Australia. Do we look <umop apisdn> from up over? Do NOT CC me - I am subscribed to the list. Replies to the sender address will fail except from the list-server.
