Timo Schoeler wrote:
> thus Alexander Farber spake:
>> Do you see any kernel output at all? I believe one
>> should always see at least the boot> prompt -
>> unless the serial speed of the console doesn't match
>>
>> Do you see the boot> prompt and have you tried "verbose"?
>>
>> On 5/11/06, Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Alexander Farber wrote:
>>> >    h754815:afarber {103} cat /etc/hostname.fxp0
>>> >    inet 81.169.186.95 255.255.255.255 NONE
>>> >    !route add 81.169.186.1 -link \$if: -interface
>>> >
>>> > PS: I wonder if anyone successfully runs OpenBSD
>>> > at Strato's SR2, MR2 or LR2 as I'd like to upgrade
>>> >
>>> > On 5/11/06, Dan Farrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> >> Geez network setups just shouldn't be that strained... I mean, what
>>> >> happened to hooking up a server with a /30 connection to the nearest
>>> >> router? Am I missing something?
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>> I think Strato, 1&1 and co introduced the .255 hack to counter sniffing.
>>> Using .0 netmask works, but won't allow traffic with other hosts in the
>>> same subnet. (Which shouldn't be a problem for most.)
>>>
>>> I have not tried any of the new Strato servers, but am experimenting
>>> with one of 1&1's new AMD64 systems.
>>> So far, nothing that i dd to the hd will boot.
>>> (tried 3.9 and current floppy and cd, modified for serial-acc and also
>>> disabling the usual kernel-options like pcibios)
>>>
>>> Anyone got one of those systems to run OpenBSD?
>>>
>>> For those interested here's the debian-resycue-system dmesg and lspci
>>> output for an 1&1 L64 server. Perhaps someone can see unsupported
>>> hardware i don't.
>>> http://openbsd.pap.st/1und1_L64.txt
>>>
>>> Any advice'd be much apreciated.
> 
> did anybody into the problem of device timeouts for the NIC itself? i
> tried to install OpenBSD on three or few machines at strato, none did
> the job. i also tried NetBSD, same problem. it seems to be up to a weird
> interrupt routing...
> 

Which kind of servers did you try?
At Strato i had no problems with the Highend SR. That's what they
offered last year. i386/Celeron 2400 running OpenBSD without a problem.

fxp0 at pci2 dev 6 function 0 "Intel 82557" rev 0x08, i82559: irq 11,
address 00:30:48:52:12:34
inphy0 at fxp0 phy 1: i82555 10/100 PHY, rev. 4
fxp1 at pci2 dev 7 function 0 "Intel 82557" rev 0x08, i82559: irq 10,
address 00:30:48:52:12:35
inphy1 at fxp1 phy 1: i82555 10/100 PHY, rev. 4

-Robert

Reply via email to