On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 05:39:40PM +0200, Federico Giannici wrote: > I have noticed that the above "UVM amap" HighUse value is equal to the > Limit value.
Indeed it looks suspicious. Not my area, though, so I'd have to look at the code to know the exact consequences. But yes, it's a possibility. Perhaps Mickey or Ted can enlighten us? -p.
