On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 06:07:53PM +0200, knitti wrote:
> On 8/7/06, Jens Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >While the networking part can be handled by carp, I'm collecting ideas on
> >how
> >to keep the local file systems in synch - especially for ftp users and the
> >mailinglist archives. The synchronization will be done via a dedicated
> >cross
> >coonect cable directly between the boxes.
>
> while I would do it with rsync (I know, depends on what you want to do),
> I don't see any reason why ccd'ing two large nfs-exposed files shouldn't
> work. But I think this would be more ugly and complicated than rsyncing
> every x minutes...
Also, I'm not sure how ccd and nfs interact, but given that ccd isn't
meant for data security (use RAIDframe) and nfs has many interesting
issues, I'm not certain I would trust my data to that.
I *believe* that, presuming the NFS server itself will not fail and
such, that RAIDframe over NFS *may* work. I'm no developer or even too
good at filesystems, though, and I would recommend a lot of testing.
Joachim