On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 11:39:22AM -0400, Will H. Backman wrote: > Does anyone know why spamd and spamlogd log to syslog at different log > levels. > It isn't too hard to change syslog.conf to include daemon.debug in order > to capture output from spamlogd, but why the difference?
I would consider spamlogd logging to be noise during normal operation. If it's working properly then you know what it's doing from maillog. As opposed to spamd logging where lots of stuff may be going on that you'd never see anywhere else. -- Darrin Chandler | Phoenix BSD Users Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://bsd.phoenix.az.us/ http://www.stilyagin.com/ |
