On 8/24/06, Scott Radvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have been installing 4.0- beta snapshots via FTP on a few machines
(i386 and amd64) and after installation, one of the sysctl
modifications I always make is increasing net.inet.tcp.recvspace so I
can make full use of my 9Mbit ADSL2+ line.
During some very simple tests to a remote ftp server via my home
internet connection (~6mbit/s) I noticed that the default recvspace of
16384 is almost 50% slower than a recvspace of 65535. I have read the
FAQ's section on "Tuning networking parameters" and section 6.6.4 says
that increasing the recvspace/sendspace is only needed on "really
high-speed, high traffic links." I personally don't feel that a
6mbit/s cable line qualifies as a "real high-speed, high traffic link"
but it might have to the author when this part of the FAQ was written.
I had not, until reading Scott's comment about increasing recvspace on
a 9mbit Adsl line, thought that I might see an increase in performance
on my own line. Does it make sense to either increase the default
recvspace, or to change the documentation to indicate that users on
home connections might see a speed increase by bumping up the
recvspace?
Thanks,
Sam

Reply via email to