On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 07:40:02PM +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote: > Moin Joerch, > > > Not everything that is committed to -stable warrants an errata > entry. So the developers need to make up their minds whether > the fix at hand does or does not - and if it does, someone has > to do the work. Once more, if it is critical, then this is done > very quickly, if not, it may take some time. >
As i read your lines i think i have heard / read this before, thanks for getting my brain back ;) > You *can* (not must) check more often - that is your choice. > Following -stable or using errata is mostly a matter of taste. Well, i still try to find out what is the best way for me. > Well, "all information" is a great word - but you will > certainly find more information in the CVS than you need > to keep your system patched and safe. > > People often say that browsing the CVS is a good idea if you > want to get some feeling what is currently being done. More information is always a good thing ;) The "all information" was a little to much, i meant more or a lot of information. Thanks for your fast answer. -- gruesse joerg "joerch" buechner --
