On 2006/09/30 23:04, Ronnie Garcia wrote: > Stuart Henderson a icrit : > >On 2006/09/30 21:59, Ronnie Garcia wrote: > >>Is it planned at any time to implement a (cisco-like) "network" > >>parameter, to be able to tell ospfd which network it should annouce ? > >> > >>Actually i need a mix of "default" and "static"/"connected" as i would > >>like my border routers (also running bgpd) to announce a default route, > >>and a few static/connected routes into the IGP. > > > >You can have more than one 'redistribute' line. > > Alright, it's just not quite clear in the man page =] > Works well, thanks.
This is clearer now (4.0/-current). > >Also did you notice > >'redistribute <prefix>'? > > This one did not work. > I'm using -stable (3.9) so it might be a new feature ? yes, added at the end of May. rev 1.16 of ospfd.conf(5): "Document all the new and shiny redistribute options" - support for redist (and no-redist) based on route-labels was supported at around the same time too.
