Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
The normal route for patch submissions is as far as I can tell via
posting the patch to tech@ and participating in any discussion that
ensues. The developers very much want to be able to take a good look
at any code before it enters the tree.
This seems to be the case; I'd posted the suggestion first to see if
such a change might be acceptable even if the code were perfect.
There seemed to be an opinion that the parser was touchy.
I wanted any debate over functionality to be separate from that over
implementation details.
thanks
geoff
