Andreas Bihlmaier wrote:
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 09:51:13AM -0800, Dag Richards wrote:
Andreas Bihlmaier wrote:
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 09:49:07AM -0700, Darrin Chandler wrote:
Greg Mortensen wrote:
On Sun, 5 Nov 2006, Darrin Chandler wrote:

Can you say what the "irrelevant" i386 machine is? Lots of difference
between a 90MHz PentiumI and a 3GHz Opteron, and I'd like to know where
those numbers fit in.
The i386 results were sent to me off-list, so I don't know the processor details. "It's fast" will have to suffice. To put it in perspective, my fastest Intel systems report:

Xeon 3.00GHz
aes-128-cbc  56117.94k  59781.24k  62908.69k  63702.29k  63485.95k

Xeon 3.40GHz
aes-128-cbc  64935.33k  71725.72k  74294.15k  75431.37k  75419.89k
My fastest:
cpu0: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 246, 1994.63 MHz
cpu1: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 246, 1994.32 MHz
type         16 bytes   64 bytes   256 bytes   1024 bytes   8192 bytes
aes-128-cbc  80713.16k  87876.85k   91431.72k    92622.31k    92688.52k

While that's *more* than fast enough for common tasks, the SBC + VIA PadlockACE numbers you gave whip the pants off it for anything > 16 bytes.
Well, you should also consider bytes/watt :)
type 16 bytes 64 bytes 256 bytes 1024 bytes 8192 bytes aes-128-cbc 48246.54k 175071.41k 472434.09k 788228.58k 980033.81k

OpenBSD 4.0 (GENERIC) #1107: Sat Sep 16 19:15:58 MDT 2006
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
cpu0: VIA Esther processor 1500MHz ("CentaurHauls" 686-class) 1.50 GHz
cpu0: FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,CMOV,PAT,CFLUSH,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,TM,SBF,SSE3,EST,TM2

Regards,
ahb

Those are very impressive numbers.
What are you getting through these gateways?
What is the net usable throughput client PCs on either end are able to exchange over the VPN?

This is just home usage, all over long 100mbit lines with dirty cheap
switches (several) in between.

#ipsec.conf (extract):
#------------------------------- Makros ---------------------------------------#
quick_enc =     "aes"
quick_auth =    "hmac-md5"    # <- sha is much more expensive
ike esp from $local_ip to $local_net peer $lan_gw \
        quick auth $quick_auth \
        enc $quick_enc \
        psk $psk_ahb
ike esp from $local_ip to $vpn_gw peer $lan_gw \
        quick auth $quick_auth \
        enc $quick_enc \
        psk $psk_ahb
#------------------------------------------------------------------------------#

ahblaptop <- vpn-gw <- ahb64

[snipping dmesg and iperf numbers]

Does anybody know if OpenVPN will also benefit form hardware encryption?

Regards,

Heinrich Rebehn

University of Bremen
Physics / Electrical and Electronics Engineering
- Department of Telecommunications -

Phone : +49/421/218-4664
Fax   :            -3341

Reply via email to