z0mbix wrote:
On 11/11/06, Federico Giannici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dunceor wrote:
> On 11/11/06, *Federico Giannici* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>
> I have upgraded an amd64 from 3.9 to 4.0.
> I followed all the Upgrade Guide using install media.
> Updated packages.
> Updated sys sources to -stable and made a new kernel.
> Everything worked perfectly.
>
> Then I download and extracted " src.tar.gz". Nothing else was
present in
> the "src" directory but "sys".
>
> I applied the "002_openssl.patch" patch and all hunks succeeded.
> Followed all compile instructions (included the "make
includes"), but
> the "make" interrupts with the following errors:
>
> cc -O2 -pipe -g -DL_ENDIAN -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H
-DOPENSSL_NO_IDEA
> -DTERMIOS -DANSI_SOURCE -DNO_ERR -DOPENSSL_NO_ASM -DOPENSSL_NO_RC5
> -DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5 -DOPENSSL_NO_MDC2 -DNO_WINDOWS_BRAINDEATH
> -DOPENSSL_NO_HW_CSWIFT -DOPENSSL_NO_HW_NCIPHER
-DOPENSSL_NO_HW_ATALLA
> -DOPENSSL_NO_HW_NURON -DOPENSSL_NO_HW_UBSEC -DOPENSSL_NO_HW_AEP
> -DOPENSSL_NO_HW_SUREWARE -DOPENSSL_NO_HW_4758_CCA
> -I/usr/src/lib/libssl/crypto/../src
> -I/usr/src/lib/libssl/crypto/../src/crypto
> -I/usr/src/lib/libssl/crypto/obj -c
> /usr/src/lib/libssl/src/crypto/rsa/rsa_x931.c -o rsa_x931.o
> /usr/src/lib/libssl/src/crypto/rsa/rsa_x931.c: In function
> `RSA_X931_hash_id':
> /usr/src/lib/libssl/src/crypto/rsa/rsa_x931.c:165: error:
`NID_sha256'
> undeclared (first use in this function)
> /usr/src/lib/libssl/src/crypto/rsa/rsa_x931.c:165: error: (Each
> undeclared identifier is reported only once
> /usr/src/lib/libssl/src/crypto/rsa/rsa_x931.c:165: error: for each
> function it appears in.)
> /usr/src/lib/libssl/src/crypto/rsa/rsa_x931.c:168: error:
`NID_sha384'
> undeclared (first use in this function)
> /usr/src/lib/libssl/src/crypto/rsa/rsa_x931.c:171: error:
`NID_sha512'
> undeclared (first use in this function)
> *** Error code 1
>
> Stop in /usr/src/lib/libssl/crypto.
> *** Error code 1
>
> Stop in /usr/src/lib/libssl.
>
>
> What could be the problem?
>
> Thanks.
Why are you trying to patch if you've upgraded to -stable? Do one of
the other. Go and re-read the FAQ about the differences between
running release + patches, stable and current.
I have written that I upgraded to -stable the KERNEL (src/sys) and
compiled a new one.
THEN I extracted the src.tar.gz archive, patched it with
"002_openssl.patch", and note that the patch SUCCEDED.
Then I tried to compile the library (following instruction in the head
of the patch) and, after a while, the compilation aborted.
Bye.
--
___________________________________________________
__
|- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|ederico Giannici http://www.neomedia.it
___________________________________________________
