On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 03:09:08PM +0100, Federico Giannici wrote: > As it is a production server, I'd like to avoid -current. > Do you think I can apply that single patch to -stable?
yes > Aaron Campbell wrote: > >On Thu, 16 Nov 2006, Federico Giannici wrote: > > > >>panic: cpu1: TLB IPI rendezvous failed (mask 0x1) > >>Stopped at Debugger+0x4: leave > > > >Try updating to the very latest snapshot. This commit from yesterday is > >supposed to help avoid these panics: > > > >Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 07:40:50 -0700 (MST) > >From: Michael Shalayeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: src > > > >CVSROOT: /cvs > >Module name: src > >Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006/11/15 07:40:50 > > > >Modified files: > > sys/arch/i386/i386: apicvec.s > > > >Log message: > >do not go processing normal interrupts after ipi. > >this is to avoid spins at high spl especialy on cpu0. > >other local interrupts (timer and softint) still do > >also pending interrupts processing. niklas@ ok > > > >-aar > > > > > -- > ___________________________________________________ > __ > |- [EMAIL PROTECTED] > |ederico Giannici http://www.neomedia.it > ___________________________________________________ > -- paranoic mickey (my employers have changed but, the name has remained)
