On 12/4/06, Chris Kuethe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 12/4/06, Karel Kulhavy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From this I have a feeling that the Links distribution of OpenBSD doesn't
> accord to the terms of GPL. Do you have an argument to convince me that I am
> wrong?
>
> I came to this by chance when I was searching for the source of Transcode
> distributed with OpenBSD, but couldn't find it.
Makefile: /usr/ports/www/links+/Makefile - source path is listed
cvsweb: http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/ports/www/links+/ -
source path is listed
pkg_info: "pkg_info links+" and look for the "WWW: ....." line
That's three places where we give you the official product homepage,
so we're not hiding it from you. We make the entire patch history
freely available, so you can't complain that we're making changes and
not making them available either.. if you feel that this is
insufficiently transparent, or overly complex, you are welcome to
submit documentation patches.
I forgot to mention ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/distfiles/ ...
original souces there, too.
CK
--
GDB has a 'break' feature; why doesn't it have 'fix' too?
