On Mon, 18 Dec 2006, pedro la peu wrote: > On Friday 15 December 2006 09:51, you wrote: > > So far for all you people who have complained about lousy ral(4) > > range or reception, only one of you has posted a dmesg (and even it was > > incomplete) and none of you have posted your interface config. > > Irrelevant.
Knowing the MAC and RF versions of the affected cards is irrelevant? > > Don't let this interrupt your complain-fest, but if you want to move > > beyond whinging and start trying to figure out what the bad performing > > cards have in common then you know what you have to do... > > Don't let this interrupt your comprehension. The common factor is ral radios. I guess ral(4) that works fine over 20m through several double-brick walls is a figment of my imagination then... -d
